Amendment 1 to CISPR 11:1997 was released by the International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in May 1999. CISPR 11 ("Industrial,
Scientific, and Medical (ISM) Radio-Frequency EquipmentElectromagnetic
Disturbance Characteristics
Limits and Methods of Measurement")
is the most widely used document for measuring electromagnetic
emissions from medical devices. It and its Amendment 1 were developed
by technical experts from around the world serving on Subcommittee
B of CISPR, the International Special Committee on Radio Interference.
The amendment makes several major changes in the document, along
with some minor ones. It adds lighting apparatus for ISM equipment
to the scope of the standard, and it changes a required antenna
distance for radiated emissions for a key class of ISM equipment.
Because CISPR documents take the form of recommendations, the
new amendment has no impact on regulations around the world until
countries adopt its provisions into their laws and directives.
This article itemizes key constituents of CISPR 11, Amendment
1.
Amendment 1 has added requirements for ISM lighting apparatus
operating in the protected frequency bands of 915 MHz, 2.45 GHz,
and 5.8 GHz. (The 915 MHz frequency is only permitted in Region
2 as defined by the International Telecommunications Union Radio
Regulations.) Note: All other types of lighting apparatus are
covered in CISPR 15, "Limits and Methods of Measurement of Radio
Disturbance Characteristics of Electrical Lighting and Similar
Equipment."
To the "Normative References" section another standard
was added: IEC 60705:1999, "Household Microwave OvensMethods
for Measuring Performance."
Limits of Electromagnetic Disturbance
The limits for ISM lighting devices within the expanded
scope of the document are the same as those for Class B, Group
2 ISM equipment. These limits are given in Tables I and II, for
conducted energy and electromagnetic radiated disturbances, respectively.
(See the sidebar on page 72 for definitions of ISM equipment categories.)
A major change in testing requirements pertains to Class
A, Group 1 equipment as shown in table III. When tested on an open-area test site (OATS), this class of equipment shall now be measured at a 10-m antenna distance for radiated emissions
rather than the previous 30-m distance. This has a tremendous
impact on testing laboratories that have been having trouble making
30-m measurements because of high ambient signal levels. Also,
many labs that have gone to 10-m absorber-lined chambers can now
make this measurement at the 10-m distance inside their protected
environment.
In addition, table 5 of CISPR 11 has been changed by the
amendment to reflect antenna distances of 10 m rather than 30
m. However, in the case of any dispute, Class A, Group 2 equipment
shall be measured at a distance of 30 m.
|
Class B Equipment Limits dB (µV)
|
|
Frequency Band
(MHz)
|
Groups 1 and 2
|
|
Quasi Peak
|
Average
|
|
0.15 - 0.50
|
66
Decreasing linearly
with logarithm
of frequency to
56
|
56
Decreasing linearly
with logarithm
of frequency to
46
|
|
0.50 -5
|
56
|
46
|
|
5-30
|
60
|
50
|
|
Note: Care should be taken
to comply with leakage current requirements.
|
| Table I. Mains terminal disturbance,
voltage limits for Class B equipment measured on a test site.1
|
|
Frequency Band
(MHz)
|
Quasi-Peak Electric Field 10-m Measurement
Distance dB (µV/m)
|
Quasi-Peak Magnetic Field 3-m Measurement
Distance dB (µA/m)
|
|
0.15-30
|
|
39
Decreasing linearly with logarithm of frequency to 3
|
|
3080.872
|
30
|
|
|
80.87281.848
|
50
|
|
|
81.848134.786
|
30
|
|
|
134.786136.414
|
50
|
|
|
136.414230
|
30
|
|
|
2301000
|
37
|
|
| Table II. Electromagnetic radiation disturbance
limits for Group 2, Class B equipment measured on a test site.1
|
Amendment 1 introduces significant changes in the requirements
of CISPR 11 for the frequency range from 1 to 18 GHz. In the
1997 standard, limits were under consideration everywhere within
this range except for the narrow frequency band of 11.712.7
GHz. For Group 1 ISM equipment, limits are still under consideration
(radiated disturbance limits for Group 1 ISM equipment are intended
to be identical to the limits currently under consideration for
information technology equipment (ITE) above 1 GHz), and with
respect to Group 2 ISM equipment, limits are under consideration
for Class A equipment. However, a more complicated scenario applies
to Class B, Group 2 equipment.
Limits are under consideration for Class B ISM equipment
operating at frequencies below 400 MHz. When finalized, these
limits will be introduced together with the following conditional
testing clause: "If, in the band from 400 MHz to 1 GHz, all emissions
are below the Class B limits and the fifth harmonic of the highest
internally generated source is lower than 1 GHz (i.e., the highest
source is less than 200 MHz), no testing above l GHz is required."
For Class B, Group 2 ISM equipment operating above 400 MHz, the
limits are specified in new tables 8, 9, and 10 of the amendment.
It is also necessary to use a new decision tree, which appears
as figure 5 of the amendment (see Tables IVVI and Figure
1).
|
Frequency Band (GHz)
|
Field Strength at a
Measurement Distance of 3 m
dB (µV/m)
|
|
12.4
|
70
|
|
2.55.725
|
70
|
|
5.87518
|
70
|
Note 1: For the protection of
radio services, competent national authorities may require
lower limits.
Note 2: Peak measurements with a resolution bandwith of 1
MHz and a video signal bandwith equal to or higher than 1
MHZ. |
| Table IV. Electromagnetic radiation disturbance
peak limits for Group 2, Class B ISM equipment producing CW-type
disturbances and operating at frequencies above 400 MHz.1
|
|
Frequency Band
(GHz)
|
Field Strength at a
Measurement Distance of 3 m
dB (µV/m)
|
|
12.3
|
92
|
|
2.32.4
|
110
|
|
2.55.725
|
92
|
|
5.87511.7
|
92
|
|
11.712.7
|
73
|
|
12.718
|
92
|
Note 1: For the protection of
radio services, competent national authorities may require
lower limits.
Note 2: Peak measurements with a resolution bandwith of 1
MHz and a video signal bandwith equal to or higher than 1
MHz.
Note 3: Limits in this table were derived considering fluctuating
sources such as magnetron-driven microwave ovens. |
| Table V. Electromagnetic radiation disturbance
peak limits for Group 2, Class B ISM equipment producing fluctuating
disturbances other than CW and operating at frequencies above
400 MHz.1 |
|
Frequency Band (GHz)
|
Field Strength at a 3-m Measurement
Distance dB (µV/m)
|
|
12.4
|
60
|
|
2.55.725
|
60
|
|
5.87518
|
60
|
|
Note 1: For the protection of radio services,
competent national authorities may require lower limits.
Note 2: Peak measurements with a resolution
bandwidth of 1 MHz and a video signal bandwidth equal to
or higher than 1 MHz.
Note 3: Limits in this table were
derived considering fluctuating sources such as magnetron-driven
microwave ovens.
|
| Table VI. Electromagnetic radiation disturbance
weighted limits for Group 2, Class B ISM equipment operating
at frequencies above 400 MHz.1
|
 |
| Figure 1. Decision tree for the measurement of emissions
from 1 to 18 GHz of Class B, Group 2 ISM equipment operating
at frequencies above 400 MHz.1
|
Specific details relating to the measuring instrument have
been replaced by a note in the amendment. The note simply refers
the user to the latest characteristics of a spectrum analyzer
as defined in CISPR 16-1, "Specification for Radio Disturbance
and Immunity Measuring Apparatus and Methods."
This section contains some substituted new words, which
read: "For measurements at frequencies above 1 GHz, the antenna
used shall be as specified in CISPR 16-1."
Microwave Cooking Appliances
With the amendment, words have been added to this clause
and new words substituted for old. The dimensions of the container
are referenced to the new standard IEC 60705, and the material
of construction may be glass or plastic or some other nonconductive
substance.
Specific measurement instructions have been added for peak
measurements above 1 GHz. The amendment states that "measurements
shall be made with the azimuth of the Equipment Under Test (EUT)
varying every 30° (starting position perpendicular to the
front door). At each of these 12 positions, a maximum hold shall
be made for a period of 20 seconds. Then, at the position where
the maximum occurred, a maximum hold for a period of 2 minutes
shall be made, and the result compared with the relevant limit."
Radiation Measurements (9 KHz to 1 GHz)
In the original paragraph 7.1.3, the wording suggested
that measurements could be made at distances closer to the EUT
than specified, but that the limit could not be changed; that
is, the limit stayed the same even though the tester was closer
to the EUT and the field strength was stronger. Amendment 1 explicitly
permits measurements at the closer distance (because of high ambient
noise levels or for other reasons), requiring that the test report
record the distance and the circumstances of the measurement.
Importantly, the new language allows an inverse proportionality
factor of 20 dB per decade to be employed to normalize the measured
data to the specified distance for determining compliance of the
product under test. The amendment
cautions that "care should be taken in measuring a large test
unit at 3 meters at a frequency near 30 MHz due to near-field
effects."
Regulated Equipment Defined by Category
Group 1 ISM equipment is equipment containing intentionally
generated and/or used conductively coupled radio-frequency
energy that is necessary for the internal functioning
of the equipment itself.
Group 2 ISM equipment is equipment in which radio-frequency
energy is intentionally generated and/or used in the form
of electromagnetic radiation for the treatment of material,
as well as spark-erosion equipment.
Class A equipment is equipment suitable for use in all
establishments other than domestic and those directly
connected to a low-voltage power supply network which
supplies buildings used for domestic purposes.
Class B equipment is equipment suitable for use in
domestic establishments and in establishments directly
connected to a low-voltage power supply network that supplies
buildings used for domestic purposes.
|
Receiving Antenna (118 GHz)
An added note says that "the distance between the receiving
antenna and the EUT shall be 3 meters."
Validation and Calibration of the Test Site (118 GHz)
The amendment substitutes new words here to make reference
to CISPR 16-2, "Specification for Radio Disturbance and Immunity
Measuring Apparatus and Methods," and to specify that "test sites
validated for field measurements between 30 MHz and 1 GHz may
be used for measurements above 1 GHz, provided that absorbing
material is placed on the ground between the EUT and the receiving
antenna."
Measuring Procedure (118 GHz)
In this area Amendment 1 adds the following recommendation:
"The general measuring procedure above 1 GHz specified in CISPR
16-2 should be consulted for guidance."
The amendment also adds this language to Clause 8.4: "Peak measurements
above 1 GHz (see table 8 or table 9) shall be the result of a
maximum hold on the spectrum analyzer. Weighted measurements above
1 GHz (see table 10) shall be the result of a maximum hold and
shall be performed with the spectrum analyzer in logarithmic mode
(values displayed in decibels)."
This annex presents examples of equipment with their appropriate
classifications. Amendment 1 adds microwave lighting apparatus
to the list.
The first amendment to CISPR 11:1997 contributes some important
clarifications to that document. It adds certain lighting devices
to the scope of the standard. It has changed antenna measurement
distances for an important class of products, allowing EMC testing
laboratories to make measurements at a 10-m distance, either inside
an absorber-lined chamber or on an OATS, instead of at 30 m. And
it modifies measurements between 1 and 18 GHz in order to reflect
changes in test equipment and field experiences with products
operating in that range. Overall, the changes are an obvious improvement
on the 1997 version of CISPR 11.
- The tables from CISPR 11 (1999-08) Ed. 3.1 Consolidated Edition
are reproduced here with the permission of IEC (Geneva). All IEC
publications are available from http://www.iec.ch
or any IEC National Committee. IEC takes no responsibility for
and will not assume liability for damages resulting from the reader's
misinterpretation of the referenced material due to its placement
and context in this publication.
Daniel Hoolihan was formerly vice president of Minnesota Operations
for TÜV Product Service Inc. (New Brighton, MN). He is the
founder of Hoolihan EMC Consulting (Lindstrom, MN) and a member
of Compliance Engineering's editorial advisory board. He can be
reached at hoolihan@emcxpert.com.
Back to July/August
Table of Contents