Q: If unsealed concrete has a
resistance in the 1.0 x 108 range and dusting
is not a problem, can this be considered a static control
floor?
A: There are several potential problems in considering
this concrete floor a static protective floor, mostly related
to lack of adequate control over the floor's properties.
First, resistance alone doesn't always indicate the
voltage that will be generated on people moving across the
floor. Tests for body-voltage generation are better indicators
of performance.
Second, the resistance of a concrete floor can vary
considerably over time. Because the resistance of concrete
is highly dependent upon its moisture content, the resistance
can change depending upon the amount of moisture present
in the concrete. Newly poured concrete will normally show
a significantly lower resistance than concrete that has
"dried out" over a couple of years. Concrete can also absorb
moisture from the ground so that changes in the water table
that often occur during rainy or dry seasons will affect
the concrete.
Third, it is difficult to provide a proper ESD ground
with a concrete floor because of its size, the metal reinforcing,
and the moisture content. Items in direct contact with the
concrete, such as grounded workbenches, may not be properly
isolated from the concrete. The concrete thus could provide
an alternate path to ground, bypassing the ESD ground on
the workbench.
Q: How do we control high levels
of static charge that occur on plastic parts dropped into
bins?
A: In part, ionization may be required to neutralize the
charge on plastic parts that are dumped into or out of bins.
Many plastic parts tribocharge quite easily as they are
dumped into the bin and as they slide against each other
within it. Also, they are usually insulators that cannot
be grounded to remove the static charge. Ionization used
in the area can neutralize these charges.
The second part of the solution is using the proper
type of bin. When charged insulative materials are dumped
into conductive or dissipative bins, the bins tend to suppress
the field associated with the static charge. If the conductive
or dissipative bin is on an insulative surface, the bin
itself may become charged by field induction. If the conductive
or dissipative bin is placed on a conductive or dissipative
surface, the induced charge on the bin can be drained away,
even though the plastic parts will retain a charge.
Bins made of insulative materials do not suppress
the electrostatic field, but tend to charge up and retain
that charge.
Additional information may be obtained by contacting
the ESD Association, 7900 Turin Rd., Bldg. 3, Ste. 2, Rome,
NY 13440; phone: 315/339-6937; fax: 315/339-6793; Internet:
http://www.eosesd.org;
e-mail: eosesd@aol.com.