Showering
Arc Testing of Electrical Products
Jerry
Ramie
Products
headed for utilities and other industrial settings need to withstand
the electrical noise produced in these harsh environments.
When
mechanical switches open to interrupt the currents flowing into
inductive loads, arcing across the switch contacts occurs. Repeated
ignition and quenching of the arc's plasma is typical in this instance.
The showering arc test was developed in the United States and Europe
to simulate this environment's effects on power and input/output
(I/O) control and monitoring lines. These environments include those
found in utility power switching, industrial installations, or other
high-reliability applications (transportation, military, aerospace,
etc.).
Industrial
automation and control products used in power generation and substation
environments in the United States are addressed by the National
Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) in its Industrial Control
and Systems (ICS) series of standards. These standards encourage
the production and testing of reliable, safe equipment for the power
industry. The ICS series of standards consists of the nine standards
shown in Table I.
The
ICS 1-2000 (General Requirements) standard was developed by the
Industrial Automation Control Products and Systems section of NEMA.
It addresses many aspects of the manufacturing and testing of industrial
and power automation products. Section 8 provides performance requirements
and tests. Section 8.10.2 states that "manufacturers of industrial
control equipment establish performance criteria for each of their
products and conduct the checking they consider necessary to provide
assurance that products shipped meet these performance criteria."1
 |
| Table
I. NEMA Industrial Control and Systems (ICS) standards. |
To
provide assurance that solid-state devices will survive and work
as intended in these high-reliability but harsh industrial environments,
Annex E of ICS 1-2000 suggests that electrical noise tests be performed
on the solid-state logic, I/O modules, and power supplies used on
these types of equipment. These tests "are intended to detect
whether noise signals injected into the power supply and input and
output wiring have penetrated the isolating means afforded by these
devices to a degree that would cause malfunction of logic gates."
With ever-increasing demand for electrical energy in the United
States, many companies that provide equipment into this market will
be required by their customers to perform the showering arc testing
described in Annex E.
Dolan Labs at American Electric Power (AEP; Columbus, OH) states
on its Web site:
 |
| Figure
1. Oscillating-polarity waveform. |
The
showering arc test is essentially an electrical noise susceptibility
test. A NEMA standard noise generator is used to perform the test.
The test set generates broadband electrical noise via an arcing
spark gap, and couples the noise onto individual conductors within
a multiconductor cable. Conductors are then used as input/output
paths for the device under test. The test is designed to test logic
input and output circuits, excluding low-level logic such as TTL,
and is appropriate for devices with solid-state control input and
output circuits such as [programmable logic controllers].2
A
more precise description of electrical noise is given in NEMA ICS
1-2000 and in IEEE C37.90.1-2002, "Surge Withstand Capability
Test for Relays." Both utility equipment standards describe
two threat phenomena: fast-rise repetitive waveforms and oscillatory
waveforms.3 Typical fast-rise repetitive (single-polarity) and oscillatory
(oscillating polarity) waveforms are shown in Figures 1 and 2.
 |
| Figure
2. Single-polarity waveform. |
These
threats are delivered by two separate showering arc generators,
which are shown in Annex E of the NEMA standard. The schematic for
the single-polarity generator is shown in Figure 3, and the schematic
for the oscillating-polarity generator is shown in Figure 4. Both
showering arc generators use 3-kV luminous-sign transformers to
generate high peak voltages with 10 mA of current.
The
oscillating-polarity showering arc generator applies the transformer's
secondary 60-Hz high-voltage sine wave across a spark gap, and the
single-polarity showering arc generator rectifies the transformer's
secondary output and applies the resulting dc voltage across the
gap. In either case, the physical dimension of the spark gap is
controlled with a lever-reduced micrometer to allow adjustment of
the ionization potential (arc-overvoltage or distance) across the
gap. This mechanical adjustment sets the amplitude of the test voltage
delivered from the generator to the multiconductor cable coupler.
 |
| Figure
3. Single-polarity schematic. |
Before
testing can begin, a verification test of the delivered voltage
and induced current into nearby loaded conductors must be run according
to Clause E5, "calibration procedure for noise generator and
coupling cable assembly." This procedure requires that the
generator be sourced into opposite conductors within the cable.
The loading resistors and current probe are to be connected as shown
in Figure 5.
The
voltage (spark-gap dimension) is set to 1500 V, and the current
probe reading must indicate that 6 A of minimum current were induced
into a nearby pair of conductors to be used for the remainder of
the tests. Figure 6 shows the showering arc generators, calibration
and spark-gap assemblies, and the coupling-cable assembly performing
this calibration.
 |
| Figure
4. Oscillating-polarity schematic. |
A
loom of 15-conductor cable is wound onto a form to make the coupling-cable
assembly, which is essentially a transformer used for coupling the
generator's transients onto the equipment under test (EUT) input,
power, and output lines. After the generator's voltage and minimum
induced current are validated, the coupling-cable assembly is used
as the path for routing input circuits, output circuits, and power
supply circuits to the EUT.
For
each type of showering arc generator, the test is run for 1 minute
each on the EUT's power, input, and output lines. This procedure
provides a total of six tests, using three connections and two arc
generators. The EUT must not change state (relay drops out or chatters)
in order for the product to have passed the test.
 |
| Figure
5. Connection diagram for coupling-cable assembly standardization. |
Although
the acceptance criteria above may sound somewhat arbitrary, it has
worked for many years for testing utility equipment used in generation
and substation plants. The generators' delivered energy, voltage
ring, or overshoot may not be fully specified, but users report
correlation between good performance on the test and reliability
of the equipment in the field. However, some questions arise. The
standard's minimum current waveform is typically exceeded by 25%
during the test, but shouldn't reliable utility products be overtested?
A spark gap is subject to wear, and the amplitude stability of the
generator's voltage changes with the gap's dimension. Ionization
sputtering will increase the gap dimension, hence raising the test
voltage. Is that going to cause the EUT to fail? It shouldn't be
that close to failure, should it? The coupling- cable assembly uses
#22 wire, which limits its current capability and exposes inattentive
operators to dangerous voltages.
Conclusion
Despite
these shortcomings, showering arc testing is necessary. The nature
of arcing switches on inductive loads in high-power utility settings
is always somewhat unpredictable. A real-world power-switching setting
is very noisy and random. It is recognized as a mixture of fast-rise-time
repetitive and oscillatory events. This could certainly describe
the threats delivered by the showering arc generators and coupler
shown in Annex E.
 |
| Figure
6. Calibration setup. |
Power
and industrial control customers will continue to use the NEMA ICS
1-2000 standard as a benchmark or figure of merit for the equipment
they purchase. Manufacturers want to sell equipment into the growing
power market, and showering arc testing to NEMA ICS 1-2000 will
be required to succeed. The availability of commercially built test
equipment for this standard has improved, and a number of laboratories
provide showering arc testing.
In
the United States, many products sold to the power industry are
currently tested for showering arc immunity to repetitive and oscillatory
threats. In Europe, tests to address these threats are specified
in the EMC product standards IEC 60255-22-4 (burst or single polarity)
and IEC 60255-22-1 (1 MHz ring-wave or oscillatory). The standards
specify measuring relays and protection equipment. It is clear that
utility products bound for either market will require testing for
immunity to these threats.4,5
References
1.
NEMA ICS 1-2000, "Industrial Control and Systems, General Requirements,"
National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), Rosslyn, VA.
Available on Internet: http://www.nema.org.
2.
"American Electric Power, Electromagnetic Compatibility &
Qualification Testing," Dolan Laboratory, Columbus, OH. Available
on Internet: http://www.aeptechcentral.com/emcqt.htm.
3.
IEEE Std C37.90.1-2002, "IEEE Standard for Surge Withstand
Capability (SWC) Tests for Relays and Relay Systems Associated with
Electric Power Apparatus," IEEE Power Engineering Society,
IEEE, New York City.
4.
IEC 60255-22-4 (2002-04), "Electrical Relays-Part 22, Electrical
Disturbance Tests for Measuring Relays and Protection Equipment-
Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Immunity Test," International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), Brussels, Belgium.
5.
IEC 60255-22-1 (2002), "Electrical Disturbance Tests for Measuring
Relays and Protection Equipment-Section 1: 1 MHz Burst Disturbance
Tests," IEC, Brussels, Belgium.
Jerry
Ramie is president of ARC Technical Resources, a provider of EMC
test equipment in San Jose, CA. He can be reached at 408-263-6486
or at http://www.arctechnical.com.
|