EMI CONTROL
Reducing
EMI with Low-EMI Clock Oscillators
Tom
Tritthart
Spread-spectrum technology allows common devices
to significantly reduce interference.
Spread-spectrum
technology can be used to reduce electromagnetic interference (EMI)
when integrated into common 8- and 14-pin dual-inline packages and
surface-mount versions as small as 5 x 7 mm. Such drop-in replacement
clock oscillators are ideal when EMI needs to be reduced by as much
as 20 dB.
Typical system
designs start out with a fundamental clock source, such as a crystal,
ceramic, or can oscillator, at some frequency; say 48 MHz, which
drives a processor, memory, serial and USB interfaces, and some
front panel controls. The 48-MHz clock is converted into other timing
components such as clock multipliers found in phase-locked loop
(PLL)-based processors, memory controllers, and interface controllers.
The original 48-MHz clock quickly becomes 96 MHz or 24 MHz to drive
a serial interface. These fundamental and harmonic frequencies can
make it very difficult for compliance engineers to achieve certification.
During the
design phase, choosing the proper package and frequency for the
clock source increases flexibility in future modifications. Even
after the design phase is done, there are always hot spots that
require some form of filtering or shielding. This is sufficient
if all that is needed is to slow down the rise time of one or two
specific nets. However, this is not usually the case. When an EMC
engineer sees that agency limits have been exceeded by 10 dB in
several higher-frequency harmonics, production must wait until compliance
is achieved. When this happens, there are three possible ways to
solve the problem: redesign in an attempt is reduce EMI, filter
and shield every net that is offending compliance, or change the
bill of material to call out a low-EMI clock oscillator.
Low-EMI clock
oscillators, (ASSM, ACSH, ACSO, and ASSL), operate over a frequency
range of 4 to 128 MHz at 3.3 and 5.0 V in commercial and industrial
temperature ranges. Products cover a wide range of applications,
including automotive, medical, industrial control, and computer
peripherals such as printers, scanners, copiers, and any other digital
systems requiring EMI clocking solutions.
Spread-spectrum
clocking (SSC) takes advantage of the fact that a frequency-modulated
carrier will have lower peak energy than a nonmodulated carrier.
By modulating the carrier frequency, the energy is spread out over
a wider range of frequencies, thereby reducing the peak energy contained
in any one frequency. When comparing a modulated clock to a nonmodulated
clock on a spectrum analyzer, it can be seen that the peaks of the
modulated clock and its harmonic frequencies are lower in relative
strength.
The difference
in relative strength of the energy of the clock is measured in decibels.
Sweeping the frequency of the fundamental clock back and forth at
some rate causes a reduction in peak energy: the wider the spread,
the greater the peak-energy reduction. To determine how much spread
is needed for a given application, use the simple formula below
to calculate the necessary decibel reduction. This formula assumes
an ideal clock with a 50% duty cycle and predicts only the EMI reduction
of odd harmonics. The calculation for dB reduction
where
F
= frequency in MHz, and
BW = total % spread (2.5% = 0.025)
is
dB = 6.5
+ 9 [log10(F)] + 9 [log10(BW)].
Using a 96-
and 480-MHz clock with a 2.5% spread, the theoretical dB reduction
would be
dB @ 96
MHz (Fund) = 6.5 + 17.84 - 14.4 = 9.92 and
dB @ 480 MHz (5th) = 6.5 + 24.13 - 14.4 = 16.21.
Regulatory
agencies control the maximum amount of radiated radio-frequency
(RF) energy. Unwanted RF energy is considered EMI, which causes
interference in local receiving equipment such as televisions, radios,
cell phones, and pagers.
The Federal
Communications Commision has two classes of radiation levels, stated
as Class A and Class B. Class A devices are digital devices intended
for use in commercial, industrial, or business applications. Class
A devices are not intended for use by the general public or in the
home. Class B digital devices are intended to be used in the home,
but can also be used elsewhere. Class B levels are harder to meet
than Class A.
Table I lists the voltage
levels allowed under FCC Part 15, for both Class A devices at 10
m and Class B devices at 3 m.
Device
Type |
Class
A (10 m) |
Class
B (3 m) |
| Frequency (MHz) |
µV/m |
dBµVm |
µV/m |
dBµVm |
| 30–88 |
90 |
39 |
100 |
40 |
| 88–216 |
150 |
43.5 |
150 |
43.5 |
| 216–960 |
210 |
46.5 |
200 |
46 |
| >960 |
300 |
49.5 |
500 |
54 |
|
| Table I. FCC Part 15 Class A and
Class B voltage limits. Equipment exceeding these limits must
reduce the excess energy. A safety margin is recommended. |
If the equipment
under test exceeds these limits, the excess energy must be reduced
to within agency limits. Reducing the excess amount of EMI to just
under the agency limits is dangerous because there is no guarantee
that the differences in manufacturing and environmental changes
might cause the energy to increase slightly.
Most companies
require a safety margin to ensure that the device always complies
with agency limits even when manufacturing processes or environmental
conditions change. Reducing a particular offending frequency that
is, say, 10 dB over the limit at the 5th harmonic can be very difficult.
The problem is further complicated by a company-imposed 4-dB safety
margin.
 |
Figure
1. The 5th harmonic of a 96-MHz clock has been reduced by
greater than 15.5 dB just by replacing the original clock
oscillator with a low-EMI clock oscillator. |
Replacing
the original clock source with a low-EMI clock oscillator is the
most efficient way to systemically reduce EMI by a significant amount.
Referring to Figure 1, the 5th harmonic of a 96-MHz clock has been
reduced by greater than 15.5 dB just by replacing the original clock
oscillator with a low-EMI clock oscillator.
Conclusion
Spread-spectrum
technology can be used to reduce EMI. By modulating the carrier
frequency, the energy is spread out over a wider range of frequencies,
thereby reducing the peak energy contained in any one frequency.
Low-EMI clock oscillators are ideal when EMI needs to be reduced
by as much as 20 dB. Replacing the original clock source with a
low-EMI clock oscillator is the most efficient way to systemically
reduce EMI.
Tom Tritthart is application engineer for Abracon Corp. (Aliso
Viejo, CA). He can be reached at 949-448-7070 or via the company's
Web site at http://www.abracon.com.
|