Safety
Approvals: Selecting the Right Components for IT Equipment
Moe
Lamothe
Problems
and delays can be avoided when designers understand the requirements
of the safety standards and select suitable components that meet
the requirements of the standard.
When
reviewing against specific electrical safety standards, testing
laboratories often find that designers have not understood many
of the critical safety-related issues in the standard. Experience
has shown that when designers are aware of safety-critical issues
when designing products and selecting components, the safety-approval
process can be achieved in a shorter time frame and with fewer failures
and problems during safety testing. This is especially true when
designing information technology equipment (ITE). Although this
article focuses primarily on component selection, electrical-safety
approval delays are caused by many factors. Some primary causes
worth noting include:
-
Selecting
ambient temperature ratings that are unrealistically high. If
possible, stay with a maximum of 40°C. Keep in mind that
each component is approved for use in a maximum temperature,
which can't be exceeded without additional testing. The ambient
temperature to consider is the temperature where the component
is located. In particular, power supplies and dc-dc convertors
are tested using a specified temperature rating. If a power
supply is incorporated in equipment of a higher ambient temperature
rating, additional testing must be conducted (i.e., temperature
and single-fault testing) to determine whether the power supply
will be safe in the increased temperature environment.
-
Specifying
an elevation rating above 2000 m for the equipment. Increased
creepage and clearance distances are required for an elevation
above 2000 m. Because most power supplies and dc-dc convertors
are approved for a maximum elevation of 2000 m, additional investigation
is necessary to ensure that the required increased spacings
are met.
-
Loading
power supplies and dc-dc convertors too close to their rated
outputs. To avoid failures caused by temperatures being higher
than allowed by the insulation system used in the power supply,
don't overload the outputs. Be wary of manufacturers' claims
for increased allowable temperatures when used at a lower loading.
Be sure that such derating factors were tested for and are part
of the power supply approval.
-
Providing
an inadequate end-user manual. Most safety standards now require
that manuals be evaluated for appropriate information. Safety
warnings and instructions, installation instructions, cleaning
instructions, and fuse replacement instructions are just as
important as the product itself.
-
Providing
a sample for testing and evaluation containing substitute components
due to unavailability of the actual component intended. Substituting
components could affect creepage and clearance distances, temperature,
or electric strength testing. Inform the test lab of any substitute
components to ensure that the substitutions are acceptable during
testing.
-
Selecting
unapproved or unsuitable components for the product safety standard
being used is a major problem. Designers usually understand
that components must be approved, but they often do not determine
whether the component is approved to the appropriate standard.
Incorporating a component that was approved to a standard with
requirements that are not consistent with the standard the product
is being approved to is equivalent to using a nonapproved component.
This
article examines what designers should look for when selecting
components for ITE. It also discusses the necessary safety approvals
for components and the documentation that designers should provide
to the test lab. When selecting components, designers should watch
for certain red flags. For example, when checking a manufacturer's
literature or Web site, remember that the statement "designed
to comply with X standard" does not necessarily mean that the
component complies with that standard. A component must be properly
approved to a standard that is harmonized with the product standard.
Acceptable component standards are generally listed in each safety
standard.
With
regard to components, most safety standards state: "Where safety
is involved, components shall be used in accordance with their
specified ratings . . . and they shall comply with the applicable
safety requirements of a relevant IEC (International Electrotechnical
Commission) or ANSI (UL) standard as appropriate." The flowchart
in Figure
1 provides a guideline for selecting suitable components.
Designers
typically select components that have several agency approvals.
Unfortunately, they often do not investigate further to determine
which standard the components were approved to. For IEC-based
safety standards, which are becoming universal, components incorporated
in the design must be investigated and approved to IEC-based component
standards or to the actual product standard that is being used
for the end product.
Both
the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) and Underwriters Laboratories
(UL) publish standards for North America. To satisfy the requirements
of standards that originate in North America, CSA- and UL-approved
components are generally suitable without further investigation.
However, the current trend is to harmonize North American safety
standards with worldwide (IEC) standards, which means that many
older North American standards are being replaced by IEC-based
standards. For example, CSA and UL are replacing their standards
for ITE (UL 478 and CSA C22.2 No. 220) and for telephone equipment
(UL 1459 and CSA C22.2 No. 225), with IEC 60950 to produce what
is now known as CSA C22.2 No. 60950 and UL 60950, 3rd edition.1–7
These new harmonized safety standards require that components
comply with IEC standards. Components may also need to comply
with UL and CSA standards as noted in the individual country deviations
listed in each standard.
When
these two standards were harmonized with IEC standards, many components
that were previously acceptable became no longer compliant. The
most common reason is that the minimum spacings (creepage and
clearance) between hazardous voltages and safety extra-low voltage
(SELV) in the IEC-based standards are greater than the spacings
required in the older North American standards. Components such
as circuit breakers, line filters, relays, capacitors, and fuses
are generally acceptable in harmonized standards if they have
been approved to the applicable IEC-based standard. Other components
such as optoisolators, motors, transformers, and resistors, which
do not always have a specific IEC-based standard, may be required
to be approved to another IEC standard such as 60950, 60601, or
60335 to be suitable.8,9
Not
all components are required to be certified to an IEC-based standard.
As components become less critical in terms of safety to the user,
fewer (if any) requirements apply. The term safety-critical
components refers to components that are relied on to satisfy
the requirements of the standard, including protection for the
user and the surroundings; components that are purely functional
are not considered critical in this sense. North American approval
is acceptable for some components such as UL-recognized printed
wiring boards (PWBs) and UL-recognized plastics. IEC approval
of these components is not required.
The
following section discusses some common components and their approval
and construction requirements.
Main
Disconnect Switch. A main disconnect switch is the switch
that users depend on to turn off the equipment when there is a
potentially unsafe condition. The disconnect switch marking can
only be a bar and circle. The disconnect switch should not have
a red actuator (red is reserved for emergency stops). However,
when the switch is in the off position, it must have a minimum
3-mm air gap between the contacts. Most switches lack this 3-mm
air gap. Specifications must be carefully examined in order to
use a given switch for the main disconnect. Note that the disconnect
device does not have to be a switch. Other disconnect devices
may include the power cord or switch or circuit breaker installed
near the equipment. All switches carrying hazardous voltages must
be approved or tested to the appropriate standard.
Capacitors
(Line-to-Line or Between One Line and Neutral). Such
capacitors must be X1 or X2, and approved by one of the major
agencies such as UL or VDE using IEC 60384-14:1993 requirements
or the equivalent.10 An X2-approved capacitor is smaller
than an X1 capacitor and can be used up to 250 V ac (see Figure
2).
 |
Figure
2. Capacitor requirements between line and
neutral. |
Capacitors
(Line-to-Ground). Line-to-ground capacitors must comply
with IEC 60384-14:1993, subclass Y1, Y2, or Y4. Y2 and Y4 capacitors
have a bodies coating that can be classed as basic insulation
at the voltage rating of the capacitor. This insulation means
that the body of Y2 capacitors used in hazardous voltage areas
can touch grounded metal, but they can't make contact with SELV
circuits. Y1 capacitors have a body coating that can be classed
as reinforced insulation. The bodies of Y1 capacitors used in
the primary can make contact with SELV circuits. Y-type capacitors
must be approved by an agency such as UL or VDE.
Varistors.
Varistors should be approved and should be used within a fire
enclosure. Line-to-line varistors are acceptable provided that
additional protective sleeving (see Figure 3) is used to protect
against scattering of potentially hazardous debris in the case
of a catastrophic failure or explosion. When used between line
and neutral conductors, varistors must be placed after the mains
fuse unless they are specifically approved for use without the
protection provided by the mains fuse. If used between the line
and neutral conductors, but before the mains fuse, varistors are
only acceptable if the component is approved to an international
standard such as IEC 61051 or CECC 42200.11,12 Varistors
are often certified to be protected by a maximum fuse value; varistor
manufacturers can provide the required value of the fuse.
 |
Figure
3. Varistor. |
Varistors
are semiconductor devices and, therefore, cannot be treated as
high-integrity devices. They must always have additional protection.
Varistors used in equipment or an installation that are coupled
with safe construction and approvals meet these protection requirements
unless the disconnection of earth is possible as a single fault.
If a single fault is possible, the slow deterioration of the device
with time, which allows an increase in earth leakage current,
is not acceptable. Varistors, therefore, are not allowed in this
type of construction.
Optoisolators.
When serving as isolation, optoisolators are treated like transformers
in that they must satisfy internal and external creepage and clearance
distances, and dielectric strength requirements. The optical barrier
has no specified thickness requirement, but the internal spacings
must meet the minimum thickness specified for the insulation in
question. If reinforced insulation is required, it usually means
internal spacings must be a minimum thickness of 0.4 mm. Most
agencies require that optoisolators be approved to VDE 0884 to
ensure that the 0.4-mm thickness is met.13 The inside
of an integrated circuit (IC) package can be considered Pollution
Degree 1.14 Currently, there is no IEC standard for
optoisolators, but the proposed standard is IEC 60747-5.15
Semiconductor
Devices. Mounting ICs to earthed heat sinks may be suitable
as basic insulation, but not as reinforced or supplementary insulation.
The material thickness must be measured and fully described in
the agency report for the end-use equipment. Approval is usually
not required.
Fuses.
Fuses are certified to various standards. The acceptability of
a fuse in an end-use product depends on the standard used to certify
the fuse. The characteristics of fuses certified to IEC 60127
are different from those for fuses certified to North American
standards.16 If a fuse is employed to provide protection
under single-fault (open or short) abnormal operating conditions,
a fuse certified to IEC 60127 is acceptable, but safety instructions
must specify that only that specific fuse be used. North American
standards do not allow alternate fuses that have not been tested
in the end-use product.
Fuses
provided for fire-hazard and overload protection must be certified
for use in the country of use. Conformity should be verified for
the fire-hazard and overload protection requirements. The requirements
are based on each calibration point of the IEC fuse according
to the applicable IEC 60127 standard sheet. Similarly, it is critical
to ensure that North American calibrated fuses provide protection
across the range of interrupting (breaking) conditions. In North
America, IEC fuses are not acceptable for protection of primary
or secondary wiring for applications in which a fuse is required
to provide protection equivalent to branch circuit protection.
They are also not acceptable when a fuse is used to provide a
Class 2 output.
IEC
fuses with low interrupting capacity are only acceptable in primary
or secondary circuits if the circuit's short-circuit current does
not exceed the interrupting capacity of the IEC fuse. This condition
must be verified. IEC fuses are identified with an L for low or
an H for high to denote their breaking capacity. Hazardous live
parts must not be accessible to operators who must replace fuses.
All interrupting devices must have an adequate interrupt capacity
for the supply circuit to which the equipment is intended to be
connected. Interrupting devices must be able to handle the available
fault current of the supply circuit. The same condition applies
to circuit breakers.
Wires.
The following information should be helpful for selecting certified
wires. When the dielectric strength required is greater than 3000
V and the insulation thickness greater than 0.4 mm, use wire types
TEW, REW (XLPVC, XLCPE), or TR-32 (600 V). When the dielectric
strength required is greater than 1500 V and the insulation thickness
greater than 0.4 mm, use wire types TXF, TXFW, TLW, TBS, SEW-2,
or SEWF-2. Remember that all wires must be suitable for the actual
temperature where the wire is located in the equipment. All of
the wires listed above have different temperature ratings, so
this factor should be considered when selecting wire.
All
wire (including wire that is passed through a PCB) and other connections
must be mechanically secure before soldering (see Figure 4). To
meet the requirement of "no hazard after a single failure," all
wire must be prevented from coming loose.
 |
Figure
4. Wire restraint. |
Earthing
(or Ground) Wire. Ground wire must be green with a yellow
tracer or yellow with a green tracer. Wire of this color scheme
generally cannot be used elsewhere in the equipment. For Europe,
the standard is a minimum of 30% green and 30% yellow. The typical
ground wire used in North America has a very thin yellow stripe
and therefore will be rejected by European test houses. The protective
earthing connection point is identified by the symbol shown in
Figure 5.
 |
Figure
5. Symbol identifying protective earthing connection point. |
A
typical buildup for a grounding stud is shown in Figure 6. The
protective earthing connection must be secured under its own nut
and star washer. Other bonding connections can be added separately.
The protective earthing conductor cannot be mounted on a removable
component or on a fastener used for a component.
 |
Figure
6. Ground stud construction. |
Power
Supplies and Dc-Dc Convertors. The selection of an appropriately
approved power supply is critical. For IEC 61010-1, a power supply
approved to IEC 60950 is generally acceptable.17 Power
supplies should be approved to at least the second edition of
IEC 60950 with amendments 1, 2, and 3. For power supplies approved
by European test houses, look for the following standard and typical
year information on the license copy for the power supply being
considered: EN 60950:2000 or EN 60950:1992, including A1 (1993),
A2 (1993), A3 (1996), and A4 (1996).18,19 The third
edition of IEC 60950 is the current edition. It is now being used
by CSA, UL, and many European agencies.
In
all cases, the conditions of acceptability for each agency approval
as well as the proof of agency approval (i.e., license copies)
must be obtained. These can be requested from the power supply
manufacturer. CE marking by itself is not recognized or accepted
as an indication of approval. CE self-declaration, which is done
in most cases without third-party verification, is also not an
indication of approval. Power supplies with only a self-declaration
are considered not approved and will require a complete evaluation.
Motors.
The declared pollution degree for the overall product will also
apply to the internal environment of the motor for the purpose
of spacings evaluation. Motors must be approved. A locked-rotor
test should have been conducted; otherwise, this test must be
done during the end-product evaluation. Although conducting this
test later is not a big issue for small dc motors, it is more
critical for larger ac motors that require an 18-day test. Be
careful when looking at the approvals for a motor; often, the
approval covers only the motor's construction and does not include
the locked-rotor test.
Transformers.
Transformers must meet the creepage and clearance requirements
for the pollution degree and insulation type required by the product
standard. Figure 7 illustrates a typical method of obtaining adequate
creepage distance by using what is often referred to as a VDE
bobbin. This term came into use because VDE has required this
type of construction for years. More recently, a variety of sizes
of triple-insulated magnet wire (listed in Annex U in IEC 60950)
have become available. These triple-insulated wires can be used
to meet the requirements of reinforced insulation and can be used
without the need for additional spacings.
 |
Figure
7. Transformer construction. |
Overtemperature
Protection Devices. Overtemperature devices include those
operating in single-fault condition. These devices must be constructed,
tested, and approved so that reliable function is ensured. They
must be rated to interrupt the maximum voltage and current of
the circuit in which they are employed.
Mains
Voltage-Selecting Devices. Mains voltage-selecting devices
must be constructed and located so that a change from one voltage
to another or from one type of supply to another cannot occur
accidentally. All such switches must be approved for the voltage,
current, and spacings required by the application.
Lights
and Indicators. As mentioned earlier, the color red is
reserved for emergency switches and must not be used for the mains
disconnect switch. Panel lights and other indicators can be any
color without restriction as long as they do not cause confusion.
For Europe, light-emitting diodes are subject to testing for harmful
radiation according to the requirements of IEC 60825-1. Testing
of LEDs is not required in North America.
Relays.
An inadequate creepage or clearance distance within a relay is
probably the most common problem encountered when evaluating components
in a product design. It is important to remember that relays are
usually providing isolation, so they are subject to the same examination
as any other isolation component within a product. Approval is
necessary, and internal spacings usually need to be evaluated.
Ensure that the relay has been evaluated to an IEC standard to
verify that the internal spacings comply with those required by
the harmonized standard.
Printed
Wiring Boards. It is generally understood that spacings
on a PWB need to be evaluated, but a common mistake is that designers
attempt to use solder masks to reduce the spacings requirements
when the masks have not been evaluated for that purpose. Spacing
is measured from the edge of the metal solder point, not the edge
of the component pin (see Figure 8). Components must be physically
mounted in such a way that no hazard can arise in the event of
the device failing catastrophically.
 |
Figure
8. Component restraint. |
Be
sure to check every component for adequate approvals to cover
the ratings of the product and make sure the specific product
standard is suitable. Do not assume it complies just because it
has an approval mark. Use the following resources to help verify
approval information:
Following
the advice provided in this article can help ensure a much more
satisfying product approval experience.
References
1. UL
478, "Information Processing and Business Equipment," Underwriters
Laboratories Inc., Northbrook, IL, no longer published.
2. CSA
C22.2 No. 220, "Information Processing and Business Equipment,"
Canadian Standards Association (CSA), Toronto, ON, Canada, no longer
published.
3. UL
1459, "Standard for Safety of Telephone Equipment," Underwriters
Laboratories Inc., Northbrook, IL, 1995.
4. CSA
C22.2 No. 225-M90, "Telecommunication Equipment," Canadian Standards
Association (CSA), Toronto, ON, Canada, no longer published.
5. IEC
60950-1 (2001-10) Ed. 1.0, "General Requirements for the Safety
of Information Technology Equipment," International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC), Brussels.
6. CAN/CSA
C22.2 No. 60950-00, "Safety of Information Technology Equipment,"
Canadian Standards Association (CSA), Toronto, ON, Canada, 2000.
7. UL
60950, 3rd ed., "Safety of Information Technology Equipment," Underwriters
Laboratories Inc., Northbrook, IL, 2000.
8. IEC
60601-1:1988, "Medical Electrical Equipment—Part 1: General Requirements
for Safety," IEC, Brussels.
9. IEC
60335-1, "Household and Similar Appliances, Safety—Part 1: General
Requirements," IEC, Brussels, 2001.
10. IEC
60384-14:1993, "Fixed Capacitors for Use in Electronic Equipment—Part
14: Sectional Specification: Fixed Capacitors for Electromagnetic
Interference Suppression and Connection to the Supply Mains," IEC,
Brussels.
11. IEC
61051, "Varistors for Use in Electronic Equipment—Part 1: Generic
Specification," IEC, Brussels, 1991.
12. CECC
42200, "Surge Suppression Varistors (Sectional Specification),"
CENELEC Electronic Component Committee, Brussels, 1986.
13. VDE
0884, "Optocouplers," Verband Deutscher Electrotechnik (VDE), Frankfurt,
Germany, 1992.
14. MA
Lamothe, "The Evaluation of Spacings in Electronic Product Design,"
Compliance Engineering 18, no. 3 (2001): 206–211.
15. IEC
60747-5, "Semiconductor Devices—Discrete Devices, Part 1: General,"
IEC, Brussels, 1983.
16. IEC
60127, "Miniature Fuses—Part 1: Definitions for Miniature Fuses
and General Requirements for Miniature Fuse-Links," IEC, Brussels,
1999.
17. IEC
61010-1:2001, "Safety Requirements for Electrical Equipment for
Measurement, Control, and Laboratory Use—Part 1: General Requirements,"
IEC, Brussels.
18. EN
60950:1992, "Safety of Information Technology Equipment," Amendment
A1:1993 to EN 60950:1992; Amendment A2:1993 to EN 60950:1992; Amendment
A3:1995 to EN 60950:1992; Amendment A4:1997 to EN 60950:1992; Amendment
A11:1997 to EN 60950:1992, IEC, Brussels.
19. EN
60950:2000, "Safety of Information Technology Equipment, IEC, Brussels.
Moe Lamothe is the president of M. A. Lamothe & Associates Inc.
(Georgetown, ON, Canada). He can be reached at moe@lamothe-approvals.com.
Moe
Lamothe is the president of M. A. Lamothe & Associates Inc.
(Georgetown, ON, Canada). He can be reached at moe@lamothe-approvals.com.
|