|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental ESD, Part I: The Atmospheric Electric Circuit
An
understanding of the atmospheric electric circuit provides an insight
into the processes underlying ESD events.
 |
|
Niels Jonassen
|
When
people hear about static electricity, most of them think of unpleasant
shocks experienced when touching a doorknob or of electronic components
being destroyed because of electrostatic discharge (ESD) events.
Fifty years ago, it was more likely that static electricity would
be connected with explosions in chemical or pharmaceutical factories
or laboratories. However, in most cases, ESD phenomena are thought
of as the result of human activity. People often overlook atmospheric
electricity, which by its nature is very similar to well-known
static electric processes.
If a properly grounded fieldmeter is brought outside and directed
upward, the meter would likely measure an electric field directed
downward with a strength of approximately 150 V·m1.
If the measurement were made on a mountaintop, the field may be
10 or more times stronger. These measurements are indicative of
fair-weather conditions.
If there is a thundercloud overhead, the field is usually reversed
and runs easily into the tens of kV·m1.
If a horizontal metal plate exposed to the free atmosphere is
connected to ground through a sensitive ammeter, it would measure
a current of about 3·1012
A·m2. A value of 3
pA·m2 is not much,
but when it is taken for the earth as a whole, the current amounts
to about 1500 A.
Although there are still many atmospheric electric processes that
are not understood in detail, there is a general understanding
of the atmospheric electric circuit (Figure 1 provides a simplified
picture of the processes). Fair-weather conditions are shown on
the left side of the figure, where a downward electric field drives
positive charges toward ground. Most of the field lines start
at positive charges in the lower atmosphere, and some extend all
the way to the atmospheric electric exchange layer (at a height
of about 60 km), the lower part of the ionosphere. The necessary
field distribution is maintained by thunderstorms (or thunderclouds),
shown on the right side of the figure. A thundercloud normally
has a negative base and a positive top, which brings negative
charges to ground.
 |
|
Figure
1. The atmospheric electric circuit.
|
Furthermore,
the values of the fields below the thunderclouds may be much greater
than the fair-weather values, often 510 kV·m1
as compared with a fair-weather field of 100200 V·m1.
The greater field strength may cause co-rona and brush discharges
from the tips of leaves and branches, not to mention lightning
rods, which contribute to the total current. Regular lightning
discharges also represent a certain current to the ground (primarily
negative), but this contribution is rather modest. The field has
the same direction above, as well as below, the thunderclouds,
causing a positive current to flow to the atmospheric electric
exchange layer and closing the circuit (see Figure 2 for an equivalent
diagram).
 |
|
Figure
2. An equivalent diagram of the atmospheric electirc circuit.
|
Between
the exchange layer and the ground, there is a voltage difference
of about 300 kV, which drives a current of about 1500 A to ground,
where it is distributed over all areas with fair-weather conditions.
This corresponds to a resistance R1 of 200 W,
representing the parallel resistance of all fair-weather air columns.
G represents the generator effect of all simultaneously active
thunder systems, and R2 and R3 represent
the resistances of the air columns above and below these systems,
respectively.
For a current to flow in a given medium, an electric field has
to be established and the medium must contain mobile charge carriers.
In atmospheric air, the charge carriers are air ions (or atmospheric
ions), molecular clusters that carry an electric charge.
An ion is formed when a neutral oxygen or nitrogen molecule receives
enough energy to lose an electron and is left as a singly positively
charged elementary ion. Within less than a microsecond, the electron
will combine with (usually) an oxygen molecule, forming a negatively
charged elementary ion.1 Other types of elementary
ions include hydroxonium (H3O+) and charged
nitrogen oxides.
Small Ions. By polarization, both polarities of elementary ions
will bind 1020 molecules of water around themselves (a few
more for positive than for negative ions) within a fraction of
a second, thereby forming small molecular clusters. These molecular
clusters are called air ions, and they are almost 100% responsible
for charge neutralization by air ions.2
Large Ions. However, any atmosphere will contain aerosol particles
or condensation nuclei in numbers from a few thousand to several
hundred thousand per cubic centimeter. These are particles or
molecular clusters with radii ranging from 1010
to 107 m. If a small ion collides with a condensation
nucleus, the two may attach to form a large ion.
An air molecule may receive the necessary ionization energy
from a colliding atomic particle or from a quantum of electromagnetic
radiation energy. In the lower atmosphere, ions are predominantly
produced by radiation from radioactive materials in the soil,
in building materials, and, first of all, in the air (radon
and its daughter products). Although all three types (alpha,
beta, and gamma) of radiation may ionize the air, alpha radiation
is by far the most important.
An alpha particle (with energies in the order of 48 MeV
[613 x 1013 J]) emitted from a decaying
radioactive atom (see Figure 3) will, along its trajectory through
the surrounding air, knock off electrons from oxygen and nitrogen
moleculesat the expense of about 34 eV per successful
collision. Cosmic radiation contributes maybe 10% to the ionization
at ground level. However, at higher altitudes, the partitioning
shifts dramatically both because the radiation from the soil
and airborne materials decreases and because the intensity of
the cosmic radiation increases.
 |
|
Figure
3. A decaying radioactive atom emitting an alpha particle.
|
Mobility
Normally, ions are characterized by their mobilities. If an
ion is exposed to an electric field E, it will move with
a constant velocity v given by
(1)
For positive ions, v is in the direction of the field,
and for negative ions, v is in the opposite direction.
The factor of proportionality, k, represents the mobility
of the ion. The unit of k is (m/second)/(V/m) = m2·V1·s1.
Small positive ions have mobilities of approximately 1.4 x 104
m2·V1·s1,
and small negative ions have about 1.8 x 104 m2·V1·s1.
The difference in mobility reflects the difference in the numbers
of attached water molecules in the ions. Large ions cover a
range of mobilities from about 3 x 107 to 8
x 108 m2·V1·s1,
depending partially on the nature and size distribution of the
aerosol particles in the air.
An ion has a limited lifetime. It may deposit on a surface
either by diffusion or by the aid of an electric field. An
ion may combine with oppositely charged ions or particles
and hence cease to exist as an ion, or with aerosol particles
and then either be neutralized or become a large ion. This
latter process usually determines the lifetime of an ion.
In polluted city air, the average lifetime may be in the order
of 1020 seconds, whereas in polar air, poor in aerosols,
the lifetime may be as long as 300400 seconds.
For a current to flow in a medium, that medium must contain
mobile charge carriers. Consider an atmosphere containing
one type of ions with the concentration n and the mobility
k, with each ion carrying a single elementary charge
e. If an electric field E is established in
the medium, a current with the density j will flow
in the medium in the direction of the field (for positive
ions) given by j = enkE or
(2)
Equation 2 is Ohm's law in differential form. The factor
(3)
is
called the conductivity of the air, and the unit is W1·m1.
It appears from Equation 3 that, of two groups of ions with
the same concentration, the group with the greatest mobility
contributes the most to the conductivity. It is often convenient
to separate the contributions to the conductivity of positive
and negative ions by introducing the polar conductivities,
that is, the conductivities caused by the positive and negative
ions, separately. In the case of an atmosphere with the
concentration n+ and mobility k+
for positive ions and n and k
for negative ions, the polar conductivities are g+
= en+k+ and g
= enk. Both
polar conductivities are positive quantities, causing positive
currents to flow in the direction of the field, with positive
and negative charge carriers moving in opposite directions.
Usually, the ions do not all have the same mobility but
are, in general terms, distributed according to some function
of frequency f(k) in such a way that the concentration
dn of ions with mobilities from k to k
+ dk is given by dn = f(k)dk.
The conductivity may then be written as
(4)
Normally, only small ions contribute significantly to the
conductivity of the air because their mobility is much greater
than that of large ions and charged particles.
At ground level, under fair-weather conditions, the average
value of the conductivity is about 2 x 1014 W1·m1.
The conductivity shows annual and diurnal variations, depending
on variations in the ionization and aerosol conditions.
The conductivity increases with increasing altitude both
because of the decrease in aerosol concentration and because
of the increase in the cosmic radiation intensity. At an
altitude of 5 km, the conductivity may be about 10 times
greater than at ground level.
It has been known for more than two centuries that the
normal prevailing condition in the atmosphere is best
described in today's language as an electric field directed
downward, bringing a positive charge to the ground. At
ground level, the field strength is about 100150
V·m1. The
field strength decreases rapidly with increasing altitude,
and at 5 km, the field strength is about one-tenth of
the value at ground level.
The potential of the atmosphere can be found by integrating
the field strength with respect to height. At a height
of approximately 60 km, the field strength is virtually
zero, and, consequently, the potential does not change
with further increases in height. This is the location
of the atmospheric electric exchange layer shown in Figure
1. The mean value of the potential of the exchange layer
is about 300 kV.
The current density (see Equation 2) is more or less constant
in a given vertical column of air and can be written as
(5)
where V is the potential of the atmospheric electric exchange
layer and Rc is the columnar resistance (i.e.,
the resistance of an air column that extends from the
ground to the exchange layer and has a unit area cross
section).
Equation 5 expresses two important relations. For a given
value of V, the conductivity g
and the field strength E are inversely proportional, which
is in good accordance with experiments. For locations
where the conductivity exhib-its small changes with time
(e.g., over the oceans), the field strength is, at a given
place, proportional to the potential of the exchange layer,
and recordings of the field strength may therefore reveal
patterns in the value of this potential.
The top graph of Figure 4 shows an example of an atmospheric
field strength recording, normalized to the mean value,
as a function of Greenwich mean time (GMT). It appears
that the field strength, and therefore the exchange layer
potential, has a minimum at 3 GMT and a maximum at 19
GMT.
Because the atmospheric field and potential are maintained
by active thunderstorms, it is therefore to be expected
that variations in the field and potential reflect corresponding
variations in concurrent thunderstorm activity. Such a
relationship is shown in the bottom graph of Figure 4.
The graph plots areas where, at a given time, thunderstorms
are active in major parts of the world. A place is regarded
as having been in a thunder area at a specified time if
thunder was audible in the interval from 60 minutes before
to 60 minutes after that time. Although this is a rather
uncertain estimate, the curve for the world as a whole
does show a correspondence with the field strength curve
plotted in the top graph, allowing a causal relationship
to be deduced.
 |
|
Figure
4. Example recordings of field strength as a function
of Greenwich mean time.
|
The
effect of the ground-level field strength of 150 V·m1
and conductivity of 2 x 1014 W1·m1
is, according to Equation 2, a current to the ground with
the density j @
3 x 1012 A·m2.
This is the fair-weather vertical current density, but
this field-induced charge transport is not the only way
by which charge is brought to the ground.
It has long been known that most precipitation elements,
such as rain drops, snowflakes, and hailstones, are often
charged. If large raindrops are falling in a strong turbulent
updraft, they may split into smaller droplets. The majority
of the smallest droplets are negatively charged because
of the Lenard effect, that is, the breakup of the electrical
double layer at a water-air interface.
A similar process may charge snow particles, but it should
be mentioned that charging processes are much more complicated
with solid materials. The charging involves contact and
friction, and the result therefore depends on the physical
state of the contacting materials (temperature, purity,
origin, etc.). For example, it has been shown that when
two ice pellets are rubbed against each other, the ice
pellet with the higher conductivity will become negative,
regardless of whether the higher conductivity is caused
by higher temperature or lower purity.
The charge brought to the ground by precipitation is normally
positive, averaging about 30 C/km2 per year,
or about 1012 A·m2.
The charge from precipi-tation together with the fair-weather
vertical current yields a positive current to the ground
of about 4 x 1012 A·m2,
or a total current of about 2000 A to the earth as a whole.
The second part of this article on atmospheric electricity
will show that the collective effects of thunderstorms
are enough to balance the current brought to the ground.
In addition, the physics of lightning discharges will
be discussed.
1. Niels Jonassen, "Ions" in Mr. Static, Compliance
Engineering 16, no. 3 (1999): 2428.
2. Niels Jonassen, "Neutralization of Static Charges
by Air Ions: Part I, Theory" in Mr. Static, Compliance
Engineering 19, no. 2 (2002): 2831.
Niels Jonassen, MSc, DSc, worked for
40 years at the Technical University of Denmark, where
he conducted classes in electromagnetism, static and
atmospheric electricity, airborne radioactivity, and
indoor climate. After retiring, he divided his time among the
laboratory, his home, and Thailand, writing on static
electricity topics and pursuing cooking classes. He passed away in 2006.
|
|