CE
Compliance Engineering
search
Join Our Discussions
Find Suppliers Useful Links
calendar
Click
here for information on advertisers and products!
About CE-Mag
Free Subscriptions
Current Issue
Article Archives
ESD Help
Mr. Static
Web Gallery
Staff Info
Contact us

 

 

 

feature article

Gaining Approval of Wireless LAN Devices in South America

Kursat Eroglu

When it comes to marketing products in South America countries, it's all about keeping up with changing rules and knowing who to ask for help.

Wireless LAN devices utilize the ISM bands at 900 and 2400 MHz, as well as bands at 5 GHz in some regions. In most countries, certification of these devices by a government agency or private body authorized by the government is required. This certification process‹sometimes called RF type approval‹varies from country to country. Fortunately, however, similarities in the process and the willingness of countries to accept each other¹s test reports and/or certifications will continue to make life a little easier for manufacturers. A good example of this is the Radio & Telecommunications Terminal Equipment (R&TTE) Directive, which eliminated country-by-country certification in all EU countries as of April 8 of this year.

Gaining Approval in South America

A major factor in the approval process for wireless LAN (WLAN) devices is the allowed frequency band. While the 900 MHz band (902–928 MHz) is not allowed in most European countries because of conflicts with the GSM band—and while restrictions are imposed by countries such as Spain and France in the 2.4 GHz band (2.400–2.4835 GHz)—most South American countries allow the use of the full ISM band for both frequencies, similar to the situation in the United States. Unlike in the United States, however, in the majority of South American countries the certificates are issued to the local distributor or manufacturer's subsidiary instead of to the international company, which does not have an official presence in the country. (Because rules pertaining to local applicants change quite frequently depending on trade policies, manufacturers should be sure to check the latest requirements as they enter a new market. Another point to keep in mind is the country-by-country variation in rules relating to site licenses. The generic rules described in this paper apply to product approvals, for which a site license is not required. However, some countries allow the operation of WLAN devices and other transmitter products with more-relaxed parameters, such as higher output power, by issuing site licenses.)

For nonlicensed WLAN operation, South American countries can be grouped into the following four categories based on their certification processes for wireless LAN products:

  • Those that require local testing.
  • Those that accept FCC test reports.
  • Those that issue exemptions based on case studies.
  • Those that issue categoric exemptions.

Each of these categories and the countries that fall within them is discussed next. Contact information—including Web site addresses where possible—is given for each of the national agencies.

Characteristics
FHSS
DSSS
900 MHz
2.4 GHz
900 MHz
2.4 GHz/
Maximum
transit
band
2.400­2.4835 GHz
902­928 MHz
2.400­
2.4835 GHz
 

Minimum number of channels

50
75
Maximum channel bandwidth
(20 dB)
500 Khz
1 MHz

Dwell
time

0.4 seconds
over 30-second period
0.4 seconds
over 30-second period

Maximum channel bandwidth
(6dB)

500 kHz
500 kHz

Maximum
output
power

Transmitter:
1 W
Tx+Antenna:
4 W


Transmitter:
1 W
Tx+Antenna:
4 W

Transmitter:
1 W
Tx+Antenna:
4 W
Transmitter:
1 W
Tx+Antenna:
4 W

Maximum
spectral
power
density

8 DBM/3 kHz
(over 1 second)
8 DBM/3 kHz
(over 1 second)

Processing
gain

min. 10 dB
min. 10 dB

Channel separation

25 kHz or 20 dB BW
(greater one)
25 kHz or 20 dB BW
(greater one)

Conducted
out-of-band
emissions

Power line: 250 mV Antenna Port: 20 dB below the carrier

Radiated
out-of-band
emissions

20 dB below the fundamental for modulation products FCC Part 15 Class B for transmitter-related peaks FCC Part 15 appropriate Class for nontransmitter-related spurious emissions
Antenna requirements
If the antenna is removable, the connector between the antenna and the unit must be a unique one and not available off-the-shelf to the customers.
Table I. Summary of FCC Part 15.247 technical requirements (prior to implementation of NPRM 99-149, which may change the allowed BW, output power, and occupancy time for FHSS systems).

Countries Requiring Local Testing

Argentina is the only country that currently falls within this category. Since 1998, the Argentinian authority known as Comisión Nacional de Comunicaciones (CNC) has required (via Resolution 302/98) that WLAN devices undergo testing by a laboratory in Argentina for compliance with Technical Norm CNC-Q2-63-01. The technical requirements of this standard are similar to the FCC Part 15.247 requirements, with the following exceptions:

  • Output power for 900 MHz FHSS systems using 25 to 49 channels is limited to 250 mW. Systems using 50 or more channels are allowed up to 1 W.
  • The EIRP limit for 900 MHz systems is 6 dBW.
  • For 2.4 GHz systems, a 6 dB antenna gain is allowed on top of 1 W output power. If higher-gain antennas are used, the output power must be reduced by 1 dB for each 3 dB of the antenna gain above 6 dBi.
  • For 5 GHz systems, antenna gain is not limited.
  • There are currently no provisions for RF exposure limitations.

Argentina also requires the application to be filed by a local applicant. Currently, application processing times vary between one and two months. The country also requires all imported ITE devices be safety-certified based on IEC 950 requirements.

Regulatory Authorities and Agencies
(listed by country)

Argentina
Comisión Nacional de Comunicaciones
Directorio
Perú 103, Piso 19
CP 1067
Buenos Aires, Argentina
 
Brazil
Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações (ANATEL)
Assessoria de Assuntos Internacionais
SAS, Quadra 6, Bloco H,
70313-900 Brasilia, DF
Brazil
 
Chile
Subsecretería de Telecomunicaciones
Ministerio de Transportes y Telecomunicaciones
Amunátegui 139—Clasificador 120
Correo 21
Santiago de Chile, Chile
 
Colombia
Comisión de Regulación de Telecomunicaciones de Colombia
Carrera 11, No. 93–46
Santa Fe de Bogota, D.C.
Colombia
Ecuador
Consejo Nacional de Radiodifusión y Televisión (CONARTEL)
La Pinta 255 y Rábida
Quito, Ecuador
 
Panama
Ente Regulador de los Servicios Públicos
Apartado Postal 4931
Panama 5
Panama
 
Paraguay
Comisión Nacional de Telecomunicaciones (CONATEL)
Edif. San Rafael—30 Piso
Yegros No. 437 y 25 de Mayo
Casilla de correo 1483
Asuncion, Paraguay
 
Peru
Dirección General de Telecomunicaciones
Ministerio de Transportes, Comunicaciones, Vivienda y Construcción
Av. 28 de Julio, No. 800
Lima 1, Perú


Countries Accepting FCC Test Reports

Brazil, Chile, and Colombia accept applications based on test reports demonstrating compliance with FCC Part 15.247 rules. The applications must be filed by local applicants and must include a translated version of the test report (abbreviated translations are accepted in most cases) and product documentation (such as specifications, schematics, block diagrams, user documentation, etc.). All three countries authorize products using either the 900 MHz or 2.4 GHz band. Approval times vary between one and three months.

The Brazilian agency ANATEL requires for certification an FCC Part 15.247 test report, an EMC compliance report or declaration, and proof (a copy) of the certification label that will be affixed to the product upon Brazilian approval. The agency has also indicated that safety certifications will be required for ITE products, but details of these requirements and their enforcement are not yet available.

Because the countries in this category require compliance with FCC Part 15.247 rules, a summary of its technical requirements is given in Table I.

Countries Issuing Exemptions Based on Case Studies

Countries included in this category are Ecuador, Panama, Paraguay, and Peru. The agencies in each of these countries issue a letter of exemption from site license requirements for products based on applications describing the product and its intended use.

Although each country seems to evaluate applications a little differently, a general description of products that includes their specifications, intended use, and typical installation procedures (how many transceivers in an installation, whether it will be in an industrial or residential area, etc.) is adequate in most cases. Typical approval times range between two weeks and three months.

Countries Issuing Categoric Exemptions

The countries falling within this category—Bolivia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Uruguay, and Venezuela—do not have well-established regulations for WLAN products. These countries issue a one-time categoric exemption to importers based on the premise that the products will not cause harm to existing RF infrastructure in the country. The exemption normally covers all products using the same technology (such as access points, end devices using the 2.4 GHz FHSS system, etc.).

Applications to these countries should include a letter explaining the product's compliance with Part 15.247 or ETS 300 328. A copy of a certificate from the FCC or one of the EU countries will also help for prompt processing of the application. In most cases, these countries will only issue the exemption to local importers.

Agencies Issuing Categoric Exemptions
(listed by country)

Bolivia
Dirección General de Comunicaciones
Palacio de las Comunicaciones, piso 4
Casilla 9360
La Paz, Bolivia
 
Costa Rica
Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad (ICE)
Sabana Norte
Apartado 10032–1000
San Jose, Costa Rica
 
Dominican Republic
Dirección General de Telecomunicaciones
Santo Domingo

Dominicana (Rep.)

Guatemala
Superintendencia de Telecomunicaciones de Guatemala
Edificio Murano Center, Nivel 16
14 Calle 3–51, Zona 10
Cuidad de Guatemala 01010
Guatemala
Honduras
Comisión Nacional de Telecomunicaciones (CONATEL)
Colonia Modelo
6a. Avenida, Suroeste
Apartado Postal 15012
Comayaguela, M.D.C.
Honduras

Nicaragua
Instituto Nicaraguense de Telecomunicaciones y Correos (TELCOR)

Dirección de Relaciones Internacionales
Edifico INSS, 60 piso
Apartado 2664
Managua, Nicaragua
 
Uruguay
Dirección Nacional de Comunicaciones
Boulevard Artigas, 1520
Casilla de Correo 927
Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
 
Venezuela
Comisión Nacional de Telecomunicaciones (CONATEL)
Ministerio de Infraestructura
Ed. Conatel, Las Mercedes
Avda. Veracruz con Calle Cali,
1060 Caracas
Venezuela


Mexico

Despite the fact that it is a North American country, Mexico is considered by many American manufacturers to fall within the same group as South American countries. Because of this—and because the country does not fit neatly into any of the four categories listed above—Mexico's WLAN approval requirements are discussed as a separate item here.

Comisión Federal de Telecomunicaciones—operating under Secretaria de Comunicaciones y Transportes (SCT)—issues temporary approvals based on compliance of the products with Mexican standard NOM-EM-121-SCT1-1994. These approvals, called Homologación Provisional, need to be renewed two times (for a total of three years) before a permanent approval is issued. The application review process involves the technical review and recommendation of the product by an SCT-recognized engineering company. These companies usually request detailed information about the product, such as schematics, manuals, and, in some cases, test reports (showing FCC compliance, for example).

Table II lists some of the technical differences between FCC Part 15.247 and NOM-EM-121-SCT1-1994, which is being reviewed by the SCT this year.

FCC Part 15.247 Requirements
NOM-EM-121-SCT1-1994 Requirements
Allowed bands 902­928 MHz and 2.400­2.4835 GHz Allowed bands 902­907.2 MHz, 922.8­928 MHz and 2.450­2.4835 GHz
Maximum output power 4 W EIRP Maximum output power 30 mW for local-area operation, 4 W for wide-area operation
Channel separation 1 MHz Channel separation 500 kHz
Table II. Technical differences between FCC Part 15.247 and NOM-EM-121-SCT1-1994, which is being reviewed by the SCT this year.

Conclusion

The main points to remember when dealing with RF approvals in South American countries are the rapidly changing regulations (similar to other parts of the world) and the importance of local contacts. Manufacturers intending to sell products in these markets should dedicate some time to investigating the most-recent rules and cultivating reliable local contacts who will be able to help with faster approvals and ultimately shorten the time to market.

Kursat Eroglu is a senior EMC engineer with Intermec Technologies Corp. (Everett, WA). He can be reached via e-mail at kursat.eroglu@intermec.com.

Illustration by James Schlesinger

 

Back to 2000 Annual Reference Guide Table of Contents