|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complying with European Requirements for Medical Equipment
and Systems
Dieter Fröhlich and Harald Buchwald
Complexities inherent in the EMC and telecommunications
regulations are multiplied when standards are in flux.
Companies wishing to sell medical electronic equipment
or systems in Europe must first grasp the changing regulatory
requirements they have to fulfill. All such products sold
in the European market must comply with requirements of
the so-called new approach directives that cover product
safety, EMC issues, and products regarded as telecommunications
devices. Safety issues, including risk analysis, are treated
in the Medical Devices Directive (MDD) 93/42/EEC and the
relevant safety standards. They are not of interest for
the purposes of this article.
The authors here focus on the complex requirements of current
EMC and telecommunications directives, outlining their development
and discussing possible sources of confusion arising as
each set of requirements undergoes revision.
Background. Since June 1998, all medical devices
have been required to comply with the MDD. With respect
to EMC, EN 60601-1-2:93 is the related standard. EN 60601-1-2
is identical with IEC 60601-1-2 and is the collateral standard
to the IEC 60601-1, which is the general safety standard
for medical electrical equipment. IEC 60601-1-2 was published
in April 1993 with the title "Medical Electrical Equipment:
Part 1: General Requirements for Safety. 2: Collateral Standard:
Electromagnetic CompatibilityRequirements and Tests."
In November 1993, EN 60601-1-2 was published in Europe.
The collateral standard EN 60601-1-2:93 contains emission
and immunity requirements. The emission test referred to
is specified in EN 55011 (CISPR 11) Group I or II, Class
A or B. To satisfy immunity requirements, the following
so-called basic standards (the old IEC 801 series on "Industrial,
Scientific, and Medical Radio-Frequency EquipmentElectromagnetic
Disturbance Characteristics") were to be fulfilled:
-
-
IEC 801-3Radiated Immunity.
-
IEC 801-4:1984Burst/EFT.
-
At the time the collateral standard was developed, the
basic standards were under revision. Now, the relevant new
publication of these standards must be usedEN 61000-4-3
and EN 61000-4-5instead of the IEC 801 series. For ESD
and EFT, IEC 801-2 and IEC 801-4, respectively, must be
used.
These tests described in EN 60601-1-2:93 are well-known
to most medical device manufacturers and therefore are not
discussed further here.
Revision of EN 60601-1-2. At this time, Working
Group 13 of IEC Technical Committee 62 is working on a new
edition of EN 60601-1-2. The development of new basic standards
and of other standards like EN 55011 has made a second edition
necessary. The committee's draft document is presently being
circulated for review, comments, and voting. Votes are due
back to the IEC by July 15, 2000. The new standard is expected
to be published around the middle of 2001 and should stipulate
a transition period of three to five years.
Some test laboratories, as well as some manufacturers,
are already recommending this second edition of EN 60601-1-2.
Nevertheless, the new standard is not officially published
yet and cannot be used to show compliance with the MDD.
Such farsightedness is a sensible impulse, however. Many
medical devices have very long development and life cycles
compared to, say, information technology products. It is
important for manufacturers of such devices to follow the
development and anticipate the future of the applicable
standards, particularly if new standards will have a great
impact on product design owing to new tests and other requirements.
By way of illustration, Table I presents a comparison of
the tests referenced by EN 60601-1-2:93 and those called
for in the proposed second edition of the standard.
|
EN 60601-1-2:93 (published May
1993)
|
| Emission: |
EN 55011 class A or B
EN 55014 for click noise |
| Immunity: |
ESD (IEC 801-2 1991): 3 kV contact,
8 kV air
Radiated Field (IEC 61000-4-3): 3
V/m, 80% AM 1 kHz (or
special bandpass), special 1 V/m, 261000
MHz |
Burst (IEC 801-4):
1 kV, flexible power supply; 2 kV, fixed
power supply; 0.5 kV, input/output lines
> 3 m |
Surge (IEC 801-5):
1 kV differential mode; 2 kV
common mode |
|
IEC 62A/247/CD:3.98
(to be published in
mid-2001)
|
| Emission: |
EN 55011 privileged class B (only for
special units class A)
EN 55014 for click noise |
| Immunity: |
ESD (IEC 61000-4-2): 2+4+6 kV contact,
2+4+8 kV air |
Radiated Field (IEC
61000-4-3): 3 V/m, 802500 MHz, AM:
80% , 1 kHz or 2 Hz, Modulation Frequency;
10 V/m from
802500 MHz for life-supporting systems
|
Burst (IEC 61000-4-4):
2 kV, all kinds of power supply; 1 kV,
input/output lines > 3 m; patient cables
are excluded |
Surge (IEC 61000-4-5):
0.5 kV, 1 kV differential mode;
0.5 kV, 1 kV, 2 kV common mode |
Conducted RF Immunity
(IEC 61000-4-6): 3 V, 80% AM,
0.1580 MHz, 1 kHz or 2 Hz Modulation
Frequency; 10 V for
life-supporting systems at the ISM frequencies
|
Magnetic Fields (IEC
61000-4-8): 50/60 Hz, 10 A/m; special
units can have less |
Ac Variations (IEC
61000-4-11): For systems with input
power less than 1 kW, voltage test level
0%, 40%, and 70%;
duration (periods) 0.5, 5, 25; voltage interruption
5 seconds |
| Harmonics (IEC 61000-3-2/3/4/5)
|
Failure Criteria:
Clinical utility is maintained. Performance
criteria and special tables with information
for the user
must be included. |
| |
| Table I. A comparison of tests that must be passed
to establish product conformity under the effective
standard EN 60601-1-2 and those specified in the draft
second edition issued by IEC Technical Committee 62.
|
Besides technical changes, the draft revision of EN 60601-1-2
introduces new specifications of information that the manufacturer
would have to provide in documents accompanying the product.
The additional information would give the end-user direction
in the use or operation of the product pertinent to EMC.
The drafters of the revised standard noted that some medical
devices cannot fulfill the specified test levels, particularly
for immunity. An example is EEGs. In such cases, the manufacturer
must demonstrate in the documentation the level at which
the product has passed (see Table II). And when a device
is operating in an environment with higher-than-average
EMC pollution, the user manual must advise the end-user
on how to avoid problems. This gives the manufacturer more
freedom in specifying the product.
If a particular safety standard (that is, a Part
2 standard of the EN 60601-2-XX type) covering a product is
published, this relaxation is not permitted; the standard
must be passed completely. Some Part 2 standards can modify
EN 60601-1-2 significantly, so the appropriate Part 2 document
should be consulted before any test plans are created.
Because the MDD is a vertical directive that incorporates
EMC and safety requirements, the horizontal Electromagnetic
Compatibility Directive 89/336/EEC and Low Voltage Directive
73/23/EEC are not applicable. This means that it is not
compulsory for medical products to show compliance with
the essential requirements of the EMC Directive.
|
Immunity Test
|
IEC 60601-1-2
|
Compliance Level
|
Electromagnetic Environment Guidance
|
|
Electrostatic discharge (ESD) (IEC 61000-4-2)
|
±6 kV contact ±8 kV air
|
|
Floors should be wood, concrete, or ceramic
tile. If floors are covered with synthetic material,
the relative humidity should be at least 30%. |
| Electrical fast transient/burst (IEC 61000-4-4) |
±2 kV for power supply lines±1
kV for input/output lines |
|
Mains power quality should be that of
a typical commercial and/or hospital environment. |
Surge
(IEC 61000-4-5) |
±1 kV differential mode±2 kV
commonmode |
|
Mains power quality should be that of
a typical commercial and/or hospital environment. |
| Voltage dips, short interruptions, and
voltage variations on power supply input lines (IEC
61000-4-11) |
<5% Un (>95%
drop in Un) for 0.5 cycle,40%
Un (60% drop in Un)
for 5 cycles70% Un(3% drop in
Un)for 25 cycles,<5% Un
(>95% drop in Un)
for 5 seconds |
|
Mains power quality should be that of
a typical of the [EQUIPMENT and/or SYSTEM] requires
continued operation during power mains interruptions,
it is recommended that the an uninterruptible
power supply or a battery. |
| Power frequency (50/60-Hz) magnetic field
(IEC 61000-4-8) |
3 A/m |
|
Power frequency magnetic fields should
be at levels characteristic of a typical location in
a typical commercial and/or hospital environment. |
| Table II. A sample document of the
type required by the proposed second edition of EN 60601-1-2
to be provided with medical electrical equipment sold
in Europe. The equipment or system is suitable for use
in the specified electromagnetic environment. The purchaser
or user should ensure that it is used in an electromagnetic
environment as described. |
Telecommunications Requirements
The Intentional Radiator. What if a medical electrical
product also includes an intentional radiator (radio) or
uses telecommunications terminal equipment? In the authors'
experience, this is the most complicated aspect of medical
equipment approval. Many manufacturers are not sure exactly
what an intentional radiator is, nor are they aware that
there is no minimum power limit below which requirements
would not apply.
In general, an intentional radiator is a transmitter, a
receiver, or a transceiver. These products establish a communication
link through the air, so that information or data are transferred
from one point to another without a wire. Examples are telemetry
products, programmable pacemakers, and wireless hearing
aids. The European standards and directives mention no minimum
or maximum limit regarding the transmitter power of such
products. Even if a product's transmitter power is less
than 1 µW and the transmission distance is less than
1 cm, the equipment is considered an intentional radiator
and must fulfill the requirements discussed here.
The R&TTE Directive. The regulatory telecom
requirements are described in the Telecommunications Terminal
Equipment (TTE) Directive 91/263/EC, amended by 98/13/EC.
This directive will be finally repealed on April 8, 2001.
A new horizontal directive, which at the moment is causing
a lot of confusion in Europe, replaced the old TTE Directive
in April 2000. It is called the Radio and Telecommunications
Terminal Equipment (R&TTE) Directive 99/5/EC, and it
now controls the conformity assessment procedure and the
introduction into the market of all radio and terminal products.
Manufacturers are being allowed a transitional period of
one year, from April 8, 2000, to April 8, 2001, to effect
the switch from applying the TTE Directive to applying the
R&TTE Directive.
The R&TTE Directive establishes a regulatory framework
for the placement on the market, the free movement, and
the putting into service of radio and telecommunications
terminal equipment in the European Union. Its Article 1
describes its scope and aim: "Where apparatus as defined
in Article 2(a) incorporates, as an integral part, or as
an accessory: (a) a medical device within the meaning of
Article 1 of Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993
concerning medical devices; or (b) an active implantable
medical device within the meaning of Article 1 of Council
Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation
of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable
medical devices, the apparatus shall be governed by this
Directive, without prejudice to the application of Directives
93/42/EEC and 90/385/EEC to medical devices and active implantable
medical devices, respectively."
This is not the place to describe the complexities of this
new directive. Suffice it to say that this directive will
allow radio and terminal equipment manufacturers following
the same rules to bring their products to the European market
faster and more easily.
While most electrical equipment manufacturers already have
a good understanding of the safety and EMC requirements
applicable to their medical products, confusion about the
complicated telecommunications requirements causes them
a lot of trouble and expensive delays in product development
and introduction. They are advised to approach accredited
test laboratories to consult about regulatory requirements
and product testing. Knowledgeable people are available
to lead the manufacturers through the entire approval process.
Dieter Fröhlich is the laboratory
manager for MIKES BABT Product Service GmbH (Strasskircher,
Germany), as well as the QMS auditor for Annex III and IV
according to the TTE Directive and Annex V according to the
R&TTE Directive. Harald Buchwald is the manager responsible
for medical products, as well as the marketing and training
manager at MIKES BABT Product Service GmbH, and he is a member
of TC 62A, Working Group 13.
|
|