Managing Radio Equipment Approvals in Eastern Europe
Foreknowledge of the various countries' requirements is
key in winning product approvals and getting to market quickly.
Now that the Western European marketplace has become harmonized
through implementation of the Radio and Telecommunications
Terminal Equipment (R&TTE) Directive, radio equipment
manufacturers are looking toward emerging global markets.
One area of potential growth is Eastern Europe, where the
telecommunications sectors are becoming more liberalized.
Many Eastern European countries are adopting Western-style
capitalist economies. Enterprises that long have been state
owned are slowly being privatized. Telecommunications sectors
within the region are moving more swiftly than many other
state-owned sectors to accommodate the new technologies that
have been developed and deployed in the West and the Far East.
The drive to develop Western-style economies is motivated
by the desire of Eastern European countries to join the European
Union (EU). Some Eastern European nations are already involved
with key European bodies, such as CEPT (Conférence
Européenne des Postes et des Télécommunications)
and the EU. This orientation toward Europe can be seen in
the adoption by many former Iron Curtain countries of European
radio and EMC standards. In turn, this trend makes regulatory
type-approval procedures easier for manufacturers to manage.
This article examines the approach manufacturers should be taking
in managing multiple product and multiple country approvals
in Eastern Europe.
Reducing Time to Approval
For radiocommunications equipment manufacturers, the aim
is simple: to gain market access in the shortest possible
time. But how to achieve this in what can be a problematic
region? Bringing products to market in Eastern Europe with
maximum speed depends on first identifying possible barriers
and opportunities.
Barriers to quick, easy introduction of radio equipment into
Eastern European markets include
-
No harmonization of approvals processes in Eastern
Europe.
-
The manufacturer's lack of access to knowledge
of regulatory approval standards.
-
The manufacturer's lack of access to knowledge of regulatory
approval requirements.
-
The manufacturer's lack of knowledge of accredited test
houses.
-
Unfamiliarity with regulatory approvals bodies and licensing
agencies.
-
The manufacturer's lack of knowledge of frequency table
allocations.
-
Possible residency restrictions.
-
Possible translation requirements.
-
A possible need for factory inspections.
On the other side of the ledger, approval procedures in Eastern
Europe are at least partially aligned with EU procedures.
Another opportunity to hasten new product introduction arises
when existing European test reports are applied, thus reducing
or eliminating the need for additional testing.
To minimize approval time frames and costs, manufacturers
must identify potential barriers and prepare to overcome them
prior to embarking on the approvals process in Eastern Europe.
Because routes to approval vary from country to country, manufacturers
are advised to compile a strategy for getting their products
type-approved within the individual countries. Routes to approval
in the different countries are described in the following
paragraphs. Steps initiated by the applicant are numbered.
It is critical that manufacturers find out whether the frequency
band for their equipment is available before undertaking any
approval application.
Albania, Estonia, and Latvia. (1) The manufacturer
prepares application documents and payment. (2) The applicant
next forwards the documents to the appropriate authority in
the country in question. The approval body reviews the applications
and any European reports and, if finding them satisfactory,
issues the approval.
Bulgaria and Lithuania. (1) The manufacturer first
arranges to have a local representative work on its behalf
in the country. (2) The company prepares application documents,
including translations, and forwards them to its local agent,
who is perhaps a distributor. (3) Next, it requests the local
representative to complete the application forms and forward
the application documents to the country's regulatory approvals
body. The approvals body reviews the initial application and
authorizes the applicant to proceed with obtaining the report
validation assessment. (4) The applicant sends the reports
to an accredited test house and arranges a contract for the
report validation. The test house reviews the European reports.
Finding them satisfactory, it validates (rubber-stamps) the
European reports and draws up a certificate of conformity.
These validated reports and certificates of conformity are
then sent to the approvals body for final approval. The approvals
body reviews the certificates of conformity and issues the
approval.
Hungary. (1) The manufacturer prepares an application
for the radio report validation and sends it to the Hungarian
test house. (2) The applicant then arranges a contract with
the Hungarian test house for validation of the European reports.
The test house reviews the European reports. Finding them
satisfactory, it validates (rubber-stamps) the reports and
draws up a certificate of conformity. These validated reports
and certificates of conformity are then sent back to the applicant.
(3) The applicant next prepares the final application for
approval, including the application for a radio license. The
application is to be sent to the customer service department
of the HIF. The approvals body reviews the certificates of
conformity, then issues the approval and license.
Slovak Republic and Slovenia. (1) The manufacturer
first arranges to have a local representative work on its
behalf in the country. (2) The company prepares application
documents, including translations, and forwards them to its
local agent, who is perhaps a distributor. (3) Next, it requests
the local representative to sign the application forms and
forward the application documents to the regulatory approvals
body. The approvals authority reviews the applications and
authorizes the applicant to proceed with the validation tests.
(4) The applicant has its local representative visit an accredited
test house and arrange a contract for the validation tests.
Test dates and fees are arranged. Validation testing against
European requirements then commences. Once the products are
compliant, the reports are written. The test reports are sent
to the approvals body for final approval. The approvals body
reviews the reports and issues the approval.
Czech Republic, Romania, and Ukraine. (1) The manufacturer
first arranges to have a local representative work on its
behalf in the country. (2) The company prepares application
documents, including translations, and forwards them to its
local agent, who is perhaps a distributor. (3) Next, it requests
the local representative to complete the application forms
and forward the application documents to the regulatory approvals
body. (For the Czech Republic, the manufacturer must forward
the Czech representative declaration form directly to the
regulatory approvals body.) The approvals authority reviews
the applications and authorizes the applicant to proceed with
the type testing. (4) The applicant has its local representative
visit an accredited test house and arrange a contract for
testing. Test dates and fees are arranged. Testing to national
requirements then commences. (The national requirements are
based upon European Telecommunications Standards Institute
(ETSI) requirements.) Once the products are compliant, the
reports are written. The test reports are sent to the approvals
body for final approval. The approvals body reviews the reports
and issues the approval.
Poland. (1) The manufacturer prepares application
documents, including translations, and forwards them to the
approvals body. The approvals authority reviews the application
and authorizes the applicant to proceed with the validation
tests. (2) The applicant arranges with an accredited Polish
test house a contract for the validation tests. Test dates and
fees are arranged. Validation testing against European requirements
then commences. Once the products are compliant, the reports
are written. The test reports are sent to the approvals body
for final approval. The approvals body reviews the reports and
issues the approval.
Benefits Accruing to Manufacturers
The preceding overview indicates how certification procedures
vary from country to country even though some European conformity
assessment procedures have been accepted and implemented.
Still, this new approach in Eastern Europe has relieved radio
equipment manufacturers of the burden of extremely long lead
times for type approvals, not to mention heavy costs. So what
advantages are reaped by manufacturers now seeking to market
products within Eastern Europe?
Results of radio testing performed in the EU can now be transported
to Eastern Europe and used to reduce, or even eliminate, the
radio testing needing to be conducted in each of the countries
of that region.
This Eastern European progress toward alignment with European
radio standards is mirrored by the adoption of EU EMC standards
as the benchmark for compliance with the requirements of many
former Eastern Bloc countries.
The acceptance of EU EMC requirements, coupled with the recognition
of ETSI radio standards, has made acquiring approvals in each
of the countries less painful. Lead times and costs continue
to be reduced.
To illustrate the improved approvals climate currently experienced
by radio equipment manufacturers marketing to Eastern Europe,
Table I summarizes the approach to acceptance of European radio
test reports by country.
Success in managing radio equipment approvals in Eastern
Europe depends largely on four key elements:
-
Identifying key contacts within the regulatory
institutions of each country.
-
Identifying all approval requirements prior to commencement
of the approvals process.
-
Finding out where existing test reports can be submitted
so that the need for additional testing can be reduced or
eliminated.
- Contracting a good distributor.
The emerging markets of Eastern Europe offer potentially
lucrative sales opportunities. The state-owned telecommunications
sectors in these countries, which once operated under strict
regimes, are now opening themselves up in order to join the
global market. This drive toward globalization has led to
the adoption, in part, of other countries' standards so that
manufacturers might have an easier time gaining access to
these markets. Makers of radiocommunications equipment who
are able to identify their opportunities can reduce the costs
of winning approvals and, more importantly, speed their time
to market.
Mark Boughen is responsible for KTL's
radio approvals group based at the company's worldwide headquarters
in Hull, UK. He specializes in assisting manufacturers with
global radio-type-approval issues.